@prefix this: . @prefix sub: . @prefix np: . @prefix dct: . @prefix nt: . @prefix npx: . @prefix xsd: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix orcid: . @prefix prov: . @prefix foaf: . sub:Head { this: a np:Nanopublication; np:hasAssertion sub:assertion; np:hasProvenance sub:provenance; np:hasPublicationInfo sub:pubinfo . } sub:assertion { sub:post a ; rdfs:seeAlso ; """Yes, you get what you optimize/incentivize for. Sometimes quantitative metrics are needed and helpful though. But for these cases there is quite a simple recipe: Base these metrics on open data, use a bunch of them for different contexts, and reconsider and adjust them regularly. Like that any kind of long-term gaming of these metrics can be canceled out by future versions of the metrics, and thereby the incentive to game them in the first place is (mostly) gone."""; orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234; "2026-03-10"^^xsd:date; "Reply to \"Who could have predicted that ...\""; . } sub:provenance { sub:assertion prov:wasAttributedTo orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234 . } sub:pubinfo { orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234 foaf:name "Tobias Kuhn" . this: dct:created "2026-03-10T19:33:59.982Z"^^xsd:dateTime; dct:creator orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234; dct:license ; npx:introduces sub:post; npx:wasCreatedAt ; rdfs:label "Reply to \"Who could have predicted that ...\""; nt:wasCreatedFromProvenanceTemplate ; nt:wasCreatedFromPubinfoTemplate , ; nt:wasCreatedFromTemplate . sub:sig npx:hasAlgorithm "RSA"; npx:hasPublicKey "MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQD4Wj537OijfOWVtsHMznuXKISqBhtGDQZfdO6pbb4hg9EHMcUFGTLbWaPrP783PHv8HMAAPjvEkHLaOHMIknqhaIa5236lfBO3r+ljVdYBElBcLvROmwG+ZGtmPNZf7lMhI15xf5TfoaSa84AFRd5J2EXekK6PhaFQhRm1IpSYtwIDAQAB"; npx:hasSignature "ul5BsS9Ahn582yxgR7FkT1uPfrvuI4jP4cLTr5/S3ksc0ScnlPZfvNoLskCae8BaWEPajW/ajn804FiRK1kheirB3Hesx2tU6LBvte9laOgNtOMR2SbdHfiUjOAZetShgZMPAq2mQm0oKwLvJdO061BCnvXHfmnTASWtm24USp0="; npx:hasSignatureTarget this:; npx:signedBy orcid:0000-0002-1267-0234 . }